IMPLICATION OF TREASURY SINGLE ACCOUNT ON BANKING SECTOR AND WHOLE ECONOMY: BY NISHI KOTHARI
Treasury Single Account – An essential tool for
government and cash management? This article proposes to discuss the delineation of
government banking arrangements – how a treasury single account addresses them,
and proposes to circumvent the contextualities pervading the implementation and
sequencing issues cohabitated while establishing and using a Treasury Single
Account. (Hereinafter referred to as the ‘TSA’)
What is a TSA?
Consolidated view of government cash resources is
given by a TSA system, the same being a unified structure of government
bank accounts. Unity of cash and treasury principles: TSA is a system of bank
accounts, linked, through which receipts and payments are transacted by the
government. The treasury is able to control and manage cash reserves
circumventing the process, by distinguishing individual cash sources via an
accounting system, and not by the residence of transactional cash in specific
bank accounts, irrespective of the attached control and reporting
conditionalties. Such an accounting system helps proper appropriation of cash
on a transactional level.
Government
cash resources are hence best managed via arrangements circumventing strategic
financial organisation. Such arrangements are integral factors to not only
enunciate the efficient control and management of government resources, but
also to ensure the effective appropriation of tax and non-tax revenues.
Government bank accounts, when unified and structurally organised, shall
facilitate optimal management of cash reserves – to reduce borrowing costs
and/or to maximize returns on surplus cash, done via the establishment of a TSA system. [1]
Developing
and low income countries, e.g. – India, have government banking arrangements,
hindering effective cash control and management due to their fragmented nature.
Idle cash is commonly found in multiple bank accounts of commercial banks. TSA
plays an important role to effectively aggregate the control of cash, being an
integral element of monetary and budget management. [2]
Major Conceptualities of a
TSA.
Idle cash
found in bank accounts is not effectively appropriated to earn economic
remuneration. The government, due to postulated ignorance, encompasses
unnecessary stipulations for raising funds to facilitate cash inflow during
shortage conditions. Idle government cash balances rested in transactional
accounts are not solely for bank usage, but also for credit extension. There
are costs vested on central banks due to these extra liquidity impositions
transferred via open market operations. Hence a reform is needed to implicate
better coordination of fiscal and monetary policies, as well as better
syndication of banking and fiscal data, the culmination of which shall improve
fiscal information coordinates, done via
first priority establishment of the TSA in such a public financial management
reform agenda. The same reduces debt services costs immensely. Other
conceptualities of such a system surround budget execution in a reliable and efficient
manner – minimisation of cash outflow; control over government remittances by
collecting banks; banking and accounting data syndication; control and
management of funds appropriated by government agencies; and effective monetary
policy implementation. [3]
Features of TSA.
Certain postulations circumferencing
such a system are denoted by its arrangements. The TSA is unified system of
arrangement – increasing the effectiveness of stipulated government cash
resources. Mainly it tries to enunciate
the sole responsibility of the government to operate bank accounts without
undue interference of the treasury. It also comprehensively encompasses government cash sources, circumferencing
budget extrapolations. [4]
Architecture of TSA.
The design of TSA is non
repetitive. There being no single model – every country has its own
postulations to implement this system. Stages of development, quality of
institutions, financial system management, technological infrastructures and
banking system maturitisations, affect the implementation of such a system.
Well-developed Public
financial management systems in countries, accommodate adequate technological
and financial systems, imbibed in the banking sector to create TSA in the
central bank. The treasury then on uses integrative encompassments: Treasury
General Ledger to record transactions of different entities. Zero – balance
should be the basis for spending agencies to establish transaction accounts in
commercial banks.
Technology used
in interbank settlements, electronic and/or manual externalities used by
central banks for clearing of transactions with commercial banks, influence the
design of the TSA. RTGS – Real Time Gross Settlements System, may also be used
by banking systems. Streamline of revenue transference, the procedures
encompassing the same, shall make TSA more efficient, and the operations of the
same are integratively compliant. An Electronic Fund Transfer System shall
enhance the transactional procedures of various suppliers and beneficiaries
bank accounts. [5]
Implicatory
Mechanisms.
The TSA
structure is independent of making budget authorisation decisions. It showcases
non-interference in matters of budget delegation for ministries and spending
units. There is considerable autonomy for budget implementation in developed
countries having decentralised budget and accounting systems. Ensuring all end
of the day balances to be swept electronically in the TSA enhances
accountability and transparency of government banking arrangements.
Cash management
and distribution responsibility issues to be separated for accounting control
and administration of transactions to avoid confusion. Systems having both
centralised and decentralised processing of transaction can be used for TSA
operation. The aforementioned also depends on the technological arrangement
enunciated in a countries banking sector, inclusive of the communications
network. The Governments banking arrangement to play a major role. [6]
Conclusion.
[1] Fainboim Yaker, I. and Pattanayak, S., Treasury Single Account: Concept, Design,
and Implementation Issues, p.1, IMF WORKING PAPERS, 10(143), (2010).
[2] Meyer, W. Treasury
single account and public fund management. p. 77-82, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL
OF SCIENTIFIC AND ENGINEERING RESEARCH, 9(12), (2018).
[3] GFSM, IMF 2001.
[4] MANUAL ON FISCAL TRANSPARENCY, p. 55, IMF, 2007.
[5] Charles. L., Setting
Up a Treasury in Economies in Transition, IMF WORKING PAPER 95/16
(Washington: International Monetary Fund), (1980).
[6] Nwoargu, I. An overview of the treasury single
account. (2015). http://placing.org/legist/an-overview-of-the-
treasury-single-account-tsa/ (Aug 5, 2020, 5pm).
Comments
Post a Comment