LEVERAGED BUYOUTS IN INDIA : AMAN GUPTA


What is leveraged buyout?

Leveraged Buyout (LBO) is one of the investment strategies of a Private Equity (PE) Firm. PE Firm, generally, raises funds from institutions and high net-worth individuals, which are invested further in the purchase and sale business. When a PE Firm purchases a company it is known as a Buyout, further, when its purchase consideration involves a major chunk of debt and a minor chunk of its own equity fund (preferably, a ratio of 70% debt to 30% equity), the strategy or transaction is then termed as Leveraged Buyout.  

LBO is an acquisition transaction that aims to achieve a controlling interest in a company. The transaction is financed through borrowings or loans by collateralizing the assets and operations of the acquiring company.[i] The PE Firm adds value to the acquired entity and repays its debt through the cash-flow of the target company to secure and maximize its internal rate of return (IRR) and convert entire debt into equity within a span of 5-10 years.

LBOs are advantageous since the debt remains secured and the acquired entity pays for itself. It provides a viable exit to a seller and tends to restructure the target company in a more efficient manner. LBOs can be demanding since it can assure a much greater return on equity. Consider the following two scenarios:

Scenario 1: Firm A wants to purchase Firm B (costing $7.5 billion) through the LBO strategy. A invests $2.5 billion equity funds and the remaining amount i.e. $5 billion is borrowed as loan @10% interest. With sufficient cash flows and stable operation, we assume the Earnings before Interest and Tax (EBIT) at $1 billion. Interest being $500 million is deducted and the remaining $500 million is further deducted @ 30% tax thereby left with earnings of $350 million after an investment of $2.5 billion equity funds.

Particulars

Amount

EBIT

1,000,000,000

(-) Interest [10% of $5 billion]

   500,000,000

EBT

   500,000,000

(-) Tax @ 30%

   150,000,000

EAT

   350,000,000

 

Scenario 2: With the same scenario as above, this time Firm A invests $7.5 billion equity funds with no interest (since no bank borrowings) and only tax @ 30% is deducted thereby left with earnings of $700 million after an investment of $7.5 billion equity funds.

Particulars

Amount

EBIT

1,000,000,000

(-) Interest

                     0

EBT

1,000,000,000

(-) Tax @ 30%

   300,000,000

EAT

   700,000,000

 

Analysis: Although, the earnings in Scenario 2 are twice that of Scenario 1, it is not proportional with the equity investment. The difference in investment i.e. $5 billion in Scenario 2 can be used for other business operations. Thus, the LBO strategy gives enhanced return on equity with two benefits:

(a)      Reduction in owner’s equity;

(b)      Tax shield on interest payment.

Criticism

Critics have argued that LBOs risk the growth of the business since the cash flow from the operating assets is routed to service leveraged debts thereby curtailing expenses for repair and replacements, lack of investment in R&D, etc. The nightmare is the scenario of an unsuccessful LBO i.e. large amount of leverage or loan might turn into a Non-Performing Asset (NPA) where cash flows would remain insufficient to repay debts, which might force the company into bankruptcy.[ii] Moreover, high-interest rates on LBO debt might damage the credit-worthiness of the company.

What are the restrictions to leverage buyout in India?

The Indian regulations prohibit procuring loans from banks/financial institutions to invest in acquiring a stressed company by collateralizing the assets of such a company. Following are the restrictions faced by the investors for carrying out LBOs in India:

1.     Master Circular of Reserve Bank of India (RBI) dated August 28, 1998,[iii] specifies that the bank should not grant advances for the promoter’s contribution to the equity shares of the company reason being that the advances should come from the promoter’s own resources.

2.     Section 67(2) of the Companies Act 2013, prohibits directly or indirectly a public company to lend any financial assistance for the purpose of purchase or subscription of shares in the target company. However, this provision is exempted for private companies.     

3.     FIPB’s Press Note 9 dated April 12, 1999[iv] bars a foreign company or investor to borrow from Indian Banks for acquiring shares in an Indian Company and states that foreign-owned holding companies would have to bring in requisite funds from abroad and not leverage funds from the domestic market for such investments. However, the domestic companies can invest through debt financing in a Foreign Joint Venture.

These regulatory frameworks restricting LBOs in India have exclusively challenged the LBO model to persist in India. 

Looking ahead

The LBO in India was spearheaded by the Tata Tea’s leveraged buyout of UK heavyweight brand Tetley for ₤271 million in 2000, the first of its kind in India. Since then LBOs have met various regulatory hurdles in its execution. The “Discussion Paper” released by the RBI in December 2013[v] that discussed upon the Framework for Revitalizing Distressed Assets in the Economy specifies the need for early recognition of the stress in principal and interest payments and declares the creation of a Special Mention Accounts (SMA) to arrest the NPAs. The RBI set up a Central Repository of Information on Large Credits (CRILC) to collect, store, and disseminate credit data to lenders. The Commercial and Non-Banking Financial Companies (NBFCs) also have to compulsorily furnish the credit information to CRILC. This would help in rectifying the deficiencies at the earliest and forming a Joint Lenders Committee for the formulation of a Collective Action Plan. Further, the establishment of a “specialized entity” as a corporate body to perform LBOs in India through individuals/institutional promoters (including the government) within a limited debt to equity ratio of 3:1 is a regulatory step to pave the way for entities and encourage financial assistance for the acquisition of distressed companies. This liberalized initiative does not concretize leveraged buyout as a mode of acquisition but creates room for a positive regulatory mindset.

Comments