HOW HAS IBC IMPROVED BUSINESS OF ENTREPRENEURS AND RESCUED THEM IN PANDEMIC: VISHAL SHARMA

 Has IBC been successful in reducing India's stressed assets | INTERVIEW -  The Financial Express

Introduction

 The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) was introduced in the year 2016 by the government to tackle the problem of insolvent companies. Since, its inception the code has brought in a revolution and made sure priority debt is paid primarily. With IBC coming into picture the problem of bad loan got solved, whereby the corporate/companies were unable to repay the loan undertaken by them and due to which the banking sector suffered huge losses. Earlier banks used to be really sceptical about granting such huge loans but with the introduction of IBC things have gotten simpler for them.

Before 2016, there was no concrete or particular law relating to insolvency of corporates and this caused a huge loss and delay. Although there were various acts to govern the working of the company such as the liquidation and winding up process was looked after by the Companies Act, 2013, debt recovery by Recovery of Debt Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 and SARFESI Act looked after security enforcement but overlapping laws made way for Bankruptcy Law Reform Committee draft and introduced the bill which further got the assent and approval in the same year of 2016.

Objective of the Code

The code simplified a lot of aspects for the corporate/companies, banking sector and creditors:[1]

a)     Simplify the Insolvency code in the country.

b)    Protect the interest of creditors and stakeholders in the company.

c)     Promote entrepreneurship and business and revive them in a timely manner.

d)    Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) was setup.

e)     Credit supply in the economy to be maintained and that the creditors do not suffer.

f)     The Insolvency Professional Agency (IPA) has the professionals enrolled with the Board to conduct resolution process.  Usually, appointed by the creditors and help in conducting resolution process.

Under the code, the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) would be the adjudicatory authority over companies and limited liability entities. While, Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) would look after individuals and partnership firms apart from Limited Liability entity. The IBBI would be the apex body for promoting transparency and the act in the country. The members of the Board shall include people from Ministry of Finance, Law Department and Reserve Bank of India.

The code makes sure that the process is carried out in a timely manner and the evaluation and viability under 180 days. For start-ups and small entrepreneurs the moratorium period is 90 days and shall be extended by 45 days.

IBC in pandemic

The government via a notification dated 24th March, increased the threshold for invoking the provisions of IBC from Rs. 1 Lakh to Rs. 1 crore. This step mainly helped the small and micro industries during the pandemic and helped in preventing the triggering of provisions of the code.

Thereafter, on June 5 section 10A was inserted after the president promulgated to the ordinance which called for suspension of initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). The reading of the amendments done by the government called for no application under section 7,9 and 10 for a period of 6 months from 25th March and can be extended to 1 year.[2] This came after the government had already hinted to make the provisions of this act suspended if the situation prevailed post 30th April 2020.

The basic question that still remains is how has this helped the business of small entrepreneurs during this time? So, the notification of 24th March helped them in the initial stage by laying out that an operational creditor of the corporate debtor can initiate the process of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) only on the occurrence of debt exceeding Rs. 1 crore. Which was earlier Rs. 1 Lakh under section 4 to initiate the CIRP process.[3] This practice shall come into picture for the cases who have still not been admitted and the small business cannot be called upon just because of a debt of 1 Lakh.

These small businesses have been rescued in such a way that no debt process or insolvency procedure can be initiated against them for regular amount and thus giving them a relief in such a distressful time

 

 


Comments